The HIV argument is another deception to compound all the
deceptions that went before. MGM appears to reduce per-intercourse
F->M HIV transmission by about 60%. That's it. That's the sum total of
the "argument" being put forth to justify it. What is missing from this
argument, aside from the fact that the foreskin includes the primary
erogenous zone of the male body
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/taylor/
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/cold-taylor/
and was specifically designed to desensitize the penis by rabbinical
scholars and quack medical doctors?
http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/yedaiah1/
http://www.cirp.org/library/cultural/maimonides/
http://www.cirp.org/pages/whycirc.html
Clearly what is missing from the HIV argument is MGM's impact on
M->F transmission. There is compelling empirical and clinical
evidence that MGM increases M->F transmission rates by more than
enough to have a net effect of increasing overall transmission
rates. This is due to increased vaginal abrasion, which compromises
the very effective HIV barrier presented by intact vaginal epithelium.
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/
http://jvi.asm.org/cgi/content/full/74/12/5577?view=long&pmid=10823865
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/chao/
http://www.circumstitions.com/HIV.html#hetero
The USA has the highest divorce rate, the highest HIV rate and the
second-highest MGM rate in the industrialized world. Is this a
coincidence? I doubt it.
Furthermore, it turns out that FGM has a similar effect on female
receptivity to HIV as MGM has on male receptivity.
http://www.aegis.com/conferences/IASHIVPT/2005/TuOa0401.html
This is probably indicative of the similarity of the tissue-type
and extent of loss caused by both types of atrocities.
Finally it should be pointed out that our so-called professional
medical organizations have a long history of such deceptive
pronouncements wrt MGM, which has been promoted as a "remedy" for
everything from masturbatory insanity to clubfoot to doctor-caused
problems like forcible foreskin retraction leading to phimosis and
UTI's. As each of these bogus arguments has fallen a new one is
found. This pattern can be readily seen to reflect their enormous
fear of being exposed for the child abusers and marriage wreckers
that they are.
-rw